Well, I have let the site stagnate for a while, theres no doubt about that, been concentrating so much on the social media side of things that the site it's self suffered, so over the next few weeks we are going to see some huge changes..

Changes such as the logo, headers, videos, shop, music, features and subscriptions.

The Shop will start to contain a lot more locally produced stock, from music, to paintings, T-shirts to beach towels.

Washroom Studio are a brand, we represent musicians and artists from all over Australia, from very humble beginnings we have stood fast, in the shadows building, learning and producing, now we are stepping forward and introducing ourselves to the world.

Its no secret that Alan MacGregor the owner, has absolutely zero tolerance for mandates, acts or rules that contradict the "laws of the land", this is legal and fully within the laws of this country to have this stance, anyone wishing to dispute that or cause any disruption to this business via discrimination will be sued accordingly, no exceptions.

What this means, is there is now a division among business owners, we are not obliged to adopt these mandate policies, some would see it as more of a courtesy toward the government, under the guise of it being the right thing to do by the people, when in fact, all they are doing is lining themselves up for bankruptcy and possibly prison, each and every one of them.

It is very hard to explain this to fellow business owners that they are in fact breaking a higher law by following a government mandate, even if I did consider following the mandates for the sake of "public safety", then I would in fact be in breach of the human rights act if I comply and discriminate, this is a catch 22 that not many businesses understand, more frightening is that the employees enforcing this under duress are also breaking these same laws as individuals, every single one of them.

The government cannot "fine" a business for not following a mandate, that is just crazy, yet so many are scared into believing they can..

The Government say they risk a 50,000 fine of they do not comply... the facts are that they WILL receive at least one $66,000 fine and possible 5 years in prison if they do comply, its as simple as that...

This is a rock and a hard place developed on purpose by a government system thats been hoodwinking people this way for a very long time, it is illegal, unethical and should be stopped immediately, the governments hands remain clean, while the business owners and their staff are decimated, as these charges I am about to show you apply to each and every individual involved, including the state premier, the person responsible for issuing this mandate in the first place.

The following was written by an Australian Barrister


A mandate is essentially just a request, and has no official standing within law. A mandate only truly comes into force when the person/business who is requested takes part/agrees.

So yes, the government response here is correct. It’s extremely dirty, but it’s correct.

The government is doing indirectly what it can’t do directly, and is passing the legal buck onto businesses.

Businesses can of course be sued under the law, if they enforce any mandates which are contrary to law (as in, actual legislation, written in black and white).

Everyone must be so, so careful. Mandates are essentially null and void if they are challenged in court, as they are only a request/direction/rule - they are not law. Also, if you receive a fine for not following a mandate, it can be challenged in court and it’ll be thrown out as you technically haven’t broken a law.

NOTICE OF LIABILTY Right of Entry To Commercial Premises — Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988—Section 94H

All State and Territory declared vaccine mandates are unlawful and in breach of the Australian Constitution section 51(xxiiiA), The Commonwealth Consolidated Acts—Privacy Act 1988—Section 94H

A mandate is essentially just a request, and has no official standing within; the Nuremberg Code of which Australia upheld after WWII and is a signatory, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as other federal and state laws including the Federal Biosecurity Act which makes any coercion or compulsion of any medical procedure unlawful including expressly “vaccines” without freely given informed consent.

The misuse of the word ‘Mandatory’ by states does not give them legislative right over the Australian Constitution section 51(xxiiiA), Federal Legislation and International Agreements and Laws.

We are not required to disclose medical health records or health information to anyone.

Such is privileged information between patient and Doctor — any coercion is in breach of the Commonwealth Privacy Act punishable by law.

I have not stated I will not comply only that such will be considered. Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988—Section 94H (2) A person commits an offence if the person: (c) refuses to allow another person to enter: (i) premises that are otherwise accessible to the public; or (ii) premises that the other person has a right to enter. Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.

Australian Human Rights Commission:

Report all breaches 1300 656 419.

No business private or public can discriminate against anyone based on race, religion, health, or disability.

Australian Constitution section 51(xxiiiA).

No government has authority to compel forced vaccinations by intimidation or by restriction of activities

A Summary of section 51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution and related case law surrounding the subject matter of "Forced Vaccinations". A 95-page High Court ruling on the meaning of this provision. British Medical Association v Commonwealth [1949] HCA 44; (1949) 79 CLR 201 (7 October 1949).

When Parliament comes between patient and doctor and makes the lawful continuance of their relationship as such depend upon a condition, enforceable by fine, that the doctor shall render the patient a special service, unless that service is waived by the patient, it creates a situation that amounts to a form of (Unlawful) civil conscription.”(at p 295).

When denie